Skip to main content

AWOL

Sorry for being gone for so long without blogging! I would like to have some sort of excuse, but the real excuse is that I can't remember what I wanted to write about for more than 5 minutes.

A semi-excuse is given by the fact that we have been variously sick over the past few days/weeks. Luke has had a constantly runny nose: it cleared up sunday, but was back running today. Eleanor had a stomach ache on Friday, and an ear ache on Sunday, and she's still not back to her old self unless she has regular doses of motrin (ahh, better living through chemistry). Michael was sick on Friday with a bug that laid him so low he didn't even feel tempted to get work done (he sometimes gets more done on "sick" days than on days when he goes in to the office). My nose is running and my head hurts, at least until the motrin kicks in. We are all getting to bed early tonight, I hope.

Another excuse is that I've been reading other people's blogs, and their comments. I especially like vigorous discussion in the comments, and maybe someday I'll be brave enough to join in. Here's what I've been reading:
  • Letters from a broad
    had some great commentary about views of Christianity, the religious right and youth. I think she probably let our own generation off too easily. One comment was not positive, and she said exactly what I would have said to the commenter, except better.
  • Thinking Christian has had some interesting discussion about intelligent design, as well as the aesthetics of Christianity. The author always responds thoughtfully to comments, and assumes that they are all written in good faith. I think there is a bit of a vocabulary disconnect between him and some of his critics.
  • Helvidius, a Pachyderm
    has been writing some compelling pro-life arguments (most of which I agree with, if you are interested in knowing). The author, Theobromophile, is very smart but sometimes I feel as though she is a little bit snide. But the arguments are fun to read, especially the early ones in her pro-life apologetics series. It is interesting to me how many arguments on both sides boil down to: "If you believe this thing that I don't believe, you must also believe all these absurd consequences if you are truly consistent." The response is naturally, "I am not that absurd," but there is insufficient mutual respect for a dialog.

Comments

C. L. Hanson said…
Thanks, I'm glad you liked my article about the religious right and young people. As far as our generation is concerned, I wouldn't say I let them off too easily -- it's more that I just didn't specifically mention them in this post. But don't forget that in my Schoolhouse Rock post I called generation X "the generation that dropped the ball":

"Older generations can rightly claim they didn't know any better. But my generation was raised with the idea that energy conservation is important and still had to get that McMansion out in the sprawling suburbs and the giant S.U.V. to drive there."
mathmom said…
Hi Chanson!

I was forgtting that other post. I remember in 11th grade doing two speeches that really changed my outlook: one on recycling (which encouraged me to help start a recycling program at my church) and global warming (way back in 1988!). The global warming speech has influenced my choice of cars, but I still ended up with the minvan (carpooling is potentially more energy efficient than a more efficient car).

Right now I'm at a loss about what more to do other than teaching my kids. Eleanor came up with an idea the other day for recycling soda straws by turning them into musical instruments =) Not all that useful, but at least she's thinking.

Just curious, have you ever done a post about separation of church and state? I'd be interested in your thoughts on that.
Gary said…
Heya! Sorry you guys have been sick =[ I hope you're all feeling better now- our guys both have colds, too, but they've been pretty cheerful nonetheless.

In regard to the above discussion, I was told by my parents that global warming is a hoax (I'm still not sure that I believe these guys have proven anything with what, 75 years of data?), but I can't afford a McMansion or an SUV. ;)

Lenise
mathmom said…
Hi Lenise! Everyone except Luke is mostly over it right now, thank goodness.

My feeling about the evidence is that even if we don't have enough to satisfy everyone, why would we not try to limit emissions? Lots of really cool technologies are just around the corner (printable solar panels! Windmills! Cars that run totally on electricity for short trips (50 miles)!) so let's make use of it. Even if global warming were a totally natural phenomenon, it would still be worth it to minimize human impact on it.

Probably that is just my skinflint-science fiction side coming through. I personally am waiting eagerly for a hybrid mini van. I'm tired of only getting 20 mpg with all the driving I do =)
C. L. Hanson said…
I haven't written specifically on separation of church and state. The closest would probably be my passionate secularism (which I think you've already seen).

Popular posts from this blog

Why you should study the history of math

  Why you should study the history of math In the mid 1300s a fad made its way around Italy. Mathematicians would challenge each other to “mathematical duels”. They would post problems for their opponents to solve, sometimes along with their solutions in coded poetry. The winners would get support and funding from rich patrons, the losers would descend into obscurity. One such contest, between Fiore and Tartaglia, involved a new method for solving the cubic. In order to win, Tartaglia worked day and night to find Fiore’s method---unfortunately, Fiore did not do the same and only knew his own method and no others. (*Recall that the formula for solutions to quadratic equations of the form use the quadratic formula, Giorlamo Cardano---physician, philosopher, astrologer and mathematician---convinced Tartaglia to share his method and promised never to reveal it. Then Cardano figured out a more general method, and wanted to share it, but was blocked by his promises. Fortunately (for Cardan

Southern butter mints---vegan edition

After the last post, we started to be able to see what the fuss was about.  The ones made with twice the butter were the best candy I have ever tasted.  Ever.  So then we started experimenting.  How long do you pull it?  Longer than you think.  And then pull a minute or two after that.  Suddenly every single batch was creaming, pretty much right after we would cut them. I tried adding less than double butter and I think they taste much better (more delicate, according to one taste tester). The latest experiment we did involved using Earth Balance instead of butter.  It cooked pretty much the same as usual, although I was distracted right at the moment I had to pull it off the stove so it cooked maybe a bit longer than usual.  Amanda and I each pulled a quarter, while Luke pulled the bigger half.  Luke's really wasn't turning very fast---perhaps because it was too hot when he took it off the marble.  Mine was turning faster than Amanda's so we traded for a while.  Aman

Southern Butter Mints part 1

Some friends of ours have a granddaughter getting married (and she's a friend of ours as well) and so I agreed to help out with the shower.  Apparently this is to be a "southern" shower, full of tradition and elegance, but not too far over the top. Among things that are needed for a shower are punch with great grandma's punch bowl, sandwiches with cream cheese and green pepper jelly, and southern pulled butter mints.  "Ah, nobody can make those anymore.  We used to know someone, but the tradition needs to be passed down."  Like a fool, I said that I'd be happy to give it a try.  I suffer greatly from "I got a PhD in math, how hard could X be?" where X is something like gardening, or quilting, or cleaning, etc.  It's always harder than I think it will be. "We'll call Mrs. X who makes these, maybe she'll pass down the method.  I hope you don't hate me!"  I was actually planning on doing research online, watching a fe