Skip to main content

AWOL

Sorry for being gone for so long without blogging! I would like to have some sort of excuse, but the real excuse is that I can't remember what I wanted to write about for more than 5 minutes.

A semi-excuse is given by the fact that we have been variously sick over the past few days/weeks. Luke has had a constantly runny nose: it cleared up sunday, but was back running today. Eleanor had a stomach ache on Friday, and an ear ache on Sunday, and she's still not back to her old self unless she has regular doses of motrin (ahh, better living through chemistry). Michael was sick on Friday with a bug that laid him so low he didn't even feel tempted to get work done (he sometimes gets more done on "sick" days than on days when he goes in to the office). My nose is running and my head hurts, at least until the motrin kicks in. We are all getting to bed early tonight, I hope.

Another excuse is that I've been reading other people's blogs, and their comments. I especially like vigorous discussion in the comments, and maybe someday I'll be brave enough to join in. Here's what I've been reading:
  • Letters from a broad
    had some great commentary about views of Christianity, the religious right and youth. I think she probably let our own generation off too easily. One comment was not positive, and she said exactly what I would have said to the commenter, except better.
  • Thinking Christian has had some interesting discussion about intelligent design, as well as the aesthetics of Christianity. The author always responds thoughtfully to comments, and assumes that they are all written in good faith. I think there is a bit of a vocabulary disconnect between him and some of his critics.
  • Helvidius, a Pachyderm
    has been writing some compelling pro-life arguments (most of which I agree with, if you are interested in knowing). The author, Theobromophile, is very smart but sometimes I feel as though she is a little bit snide. But the arguments are fun to read, especially the early ones in her pro-life apologetics series. It is interesting to me how many arguments on both sides boil down to: "If you believe this thing that I don't believe, you must also believe all these absurd consequences if you are truly consistent." The response is naturally, "I am not that absurd," but there is insufficient mutual respect for a dialog.

Comments

C. L. Hanson said…
Thanks, I'm glad you liked my article about the religious right and young people. As far as our generation is concerned, I wouldn't say I let them off too easily -- it's more that I just didn't specifically mention them in this post. But don't forget that in my Schoolhouse Rock post I called generation X "the generation that dropped the ball":

"Older generations can rightly claim they didn't know any better. But my generation was raised with the idea that energy conservation is important and still had to get that McMansion out in the sprawling suburbs and the giant S.U.V. to drive there."
mathmom said…
Hi Chanson!

I was forgtting that other post. I remember in 11th grade doing two speeches that really changed my outlook: one on recycling (which encouraged me to help start a recycling program at my church) and global warming (way back in 1988!). The global warming speech has influenced my choice of cars, but I still ended up with the minvan (carpooling is potentially more energy efficient than a more efficient car).

Right now I'm at a loss about what more to do other than teaching my kids. Eleanor came up with an idea the other day for recycling soda straws by turning them into musical instruments =) Not all that useful, but at least she's thinking.

Just curious, have you ever done a post about separation of church and state? I'd be interested in your thoughts on that.
Gary said…
Heya! Sorry you guys have been sick =[ I hope you're all feeling better now- our guys both have colds, too, but they've been pretty cheerful nonetheless.

In regard to the above discussion, I was told by my parents that global warming is a hoax (I'm still not sure that I believe these guys have proven anything with what, 75 years of data?), but I can't afford a McMansion or an SUV. ;)

Lenise
mathmom said…
Hi Lenise! Everyone except Luke is mostly over it right now, thank goodness.

My feeling about the evidence is that even if we don't have enough to satisfy everyone, why would we not try to limit emissions? Lots of really cool technologies are just around the corner (printable solar panels! Windmills! Cars that run totally on electricity for short trips (50 miles)!) so let's make use of it. Even if global warming were a totally natural phenomenon, it would still be worth it to minimize human impact on it.

Probably that is just my skinflint-science fiction side coming through. I personally am waiting eagerly for a hybrid mini van. I'm tired of only getting 20 mpg with all the driving I do =)
C. L. Hanson said…
I haven't written specifically on separation of church and state. The closest would probably be my passionate secularism (which I think you've already seen).

Popular posts from this blog

Why you should study the history of math

  Why you should study the history of math In the mid 1300s a fad made its way around Italy. Mathematicians would challenge each other to “mathematical duels”. They would post problems for their opponents to solve, sometimes along with their solutions in coded poetry. The winners would get support and funding from rich patrons, the losers would descend into obscurity. One such contest, between Fiore and Tartaglia, involved a new method for solving the cubic. In order to win, Tartaglia worked day and night to find Fiore’s method---unfortunately, Fiore did not do the same and only knew his own method and no others. (*Recall that the formula for solutions to quadratic equations of the form use the quadratic formula, Giorlamo Cardano---physician, philosopher, astrologer and mathematician---convinced Tartaglia to share his method and promised never to reveal it. Then Cardano figured out a more general method, and wanted to share it, but was blocked by his promises. Fortunately (for Ca...

Books I like: reality edition

Here are some more books from my childhood and later. I read a lot as a kid, and these books are the ones that stand out in my memory. I figure that if I can remember them 25 years after I read them, they must be pretty good. I'm calling this the "Reality Segment," not fantasy, not science fiction, not history, just real life. The Westing Game by Ellen Raskin : This is probably my favorite children's book of all time. I read it in 3rd grade or so, then read it again to clear it up more. Then I read it in 6 th grade and finally understood what was going on during the second reading of the will. In more recent readings I've understood more about Sydelle Paulaski and the relationship between Dr. Denton and the lovely Angela. What a pleasure. Ellen Raskin has written many other good children's books (all quirky and surprising) but this is the jewel. Bruno and Boots books by Gordon Korman : As the FNDP (Friendly Neighborhood Developmental Psychologis...

Books I like: magic/science fiction

I read a lot of science fiction and fantasy when I was younger, so I was surprised when I was thinking about this list at how few books were on it. The other thing that is interesting is how many books I just remember a few details from, but not anything useful like a title or author. Half Magic and the whole series, by Edward Eager: My favorite is Knight's Castle, although I suspect I would have enjoyed it more if I had ever read Ivanhoe... Mrs. Piggle Wiggle by Betty MacDonald: I'm not sure when it happened, but I now identify with the parents rather than the kids. The Seven Citadels by Geraldine Harris: I came back to the Jr. High library to check this out even after I moved on to the high school. Girl with the Silver Eyes by Wilo Davis Roberts: I always wondered what would happen if I had ESP and other "special" abilities. The OZ books, by L. Frank Baum: I read almost all of these (all the ones I could find in the library, rather). My favorite is Tik - To...