Skip to main content

Parenting successes?

Chanson at Letters from a Broad has a post which includes of one of her parenting successes, involving the benedictory smile of a Swiss cashier. I've had some of those public recognitions of good parenting, and I always try to point out to parents when their kids are doing particularly well (especially when the parents look harried). Sometimes, though, the success doesn't look like a success to outsiders.

Last week we took the kids to our favorite Greek restaurant. We have been getting gyros for Amanda for a few years now (dairy, egg and nut free!), and we have typically gotten one plate of gyros for Amanda and Luke to share. We get it with french fries, and Amanda is "rewarded" for eating the meat by getting to eat as many french fries as she can (she needs all the calories she can get). Luke's idea, smart boy that he is, is that he doesn't need to eat anything other than the french fries.

This week we had had enough of this, and instead of letting Luke eat his french fry lunch, we tried to get him to eat the gyros first. He was having none of it, so he threw a fit in the middle of the restaurant.

Rather than giving in and reinforcing his bad behavior, Michael and I stood our ground. In hopes that he would not disturb the other diners, one of us would take him out of the restaurant while the other ate. Every once in a while, Luke would calm down and agree to be quiet and eat his food, only to dissolve in tears again when we brought him inside and wouldn't let him eat the fries. This went on for a long time, while Amanda proceeded to eat all but one of the slices of meat from the adult sized gyros platter, as well as most of the french fries. I had resigned myself to taking Luke home hungry---not a tragedy, but not what I had hoped for.

Finally he came in and took one bite of the gyros. Then another, and another, until he had eaten all that was on his plate. I think he would have eaten more if we had saved some for him---once he got over his dislike, he found it tasted good! And then he got to eat his favorite, french fries.

To someone looking on, it looked like one ill-behaved child, being taken out of the restaurant by parents who would probably never get to eat a nice meal again and had no right to bring the baby to the restaurant in the first place. But to me, it looked like a little boy learning that his temper tantrums did not result in getting what he wanted, and learning that when he is at a restaurant he is expected to eat what is in front of him without complaining. I can't imagine anyone telling me that I did a good job there, but I do feel that progress was made---doesn't that count as success? I think so.

(I did notice myself judging the parents who brought McDonalds for their 8-year-old boy, which seems a bit gauche. But perhaps he had allergies, and I really can't talk, since my boy was screaming and throwing himself on the floor.)

Unfortunately, since that small success, Luke still insists that he gets to choose what to eat (mostly dessert, sometimes chips, etc.) and he doesn't want to eat whatever I have ordered him for lunch. Maybe a few hundred times more... or maybe he'll learn to tell me what he wants for lunch, first.

Comments

Danlj said…
I think that parenting can perhaps be represented as an N-dimensional table where N=characteristics and each characteristic has two axes: one for 'parent' and one for 'child' (we will ignore for now the geometrical effect of multiple children and multiple parents/friends/teachers/grands/strangers). And each characteristic has at least 3 qualitative ratings: constructive / neutral / counterproductive or damaging.
Characteristics include things like 'compliance' 'anxiety' 'social perceptiveness' 'strength of will' 'emotional lability' 'orderliness (nee OCD)' and on and on.

We are simply unaware of the profundity of individual differences this creates, and delude us unto thinking that we are actually responsible for the good (or the bad) outcomes of our parenting interventions. Children mature because they are designed, like oaks to mature; and they are more or less socially competent because we are designed to be social.

Everything else is nuance.

As parents, we mostly help the process along, and sometime we are clumsy and break parts of our kids; the most troublesome broken-ness comes from thinking we must do something (or must refrain), or from pure ignorance (of which there is plenty enough to pass around).

As a friend said once when I complimented him on his children's good outcomes, "You get what you pay attention to." And he paid (and pays) attention to his kids in positive ways. Never "permissive" in the negligent sense, always attentive in the interpersonal sense. His children have not gone hungry for their father. This makes a difference.
Unknown said…
I miss Neomande, the best Lebanese restaurant in Raleigh!

Popular posts from this blog

Why you should study the history of math

  Why you should study the history of math In the mid 1300s a fad made its way around Italy. Mathematicians would challenge each other to “mathematical duels”. They would post problems for their opponents to solve, sometimes along with their solutions in coded poetry. The winners would get support and funding from rich patrons, the losers would descend into obscurity. One such contest, between Fiore and Tartaglia, involved a new method for solving the cubic. In order to win, Tartaglia worked day and night to find Fiore’s method---unfortunately, Fiore did not do the same and only knew his own method and no others. (*Recall that the formula for solutions to quadratic equations of the form use the quadratic formula, Giorlamo Cardano---physician, philosopher, astrologer and mathematician---convinced Tartaglia to share his method and promised never to reveal it. Then Cardano figured out a more general method, and wanted to share it, but was blocked by his promises. Fortunately (for Cardan

Books I like: reality edition

Here are some more books from my childhood and later. I read a lot as a kid, and these books are the ones that stand out in my memory. I figure that if I can remember them 25 years after I read them, they must be pretty good. I'm calling this the "Reality Segment," not fantasy, not science fiction, not history, just real life. The Westing Game by Ellen Raskin : This is probably my favorite children's book of all time. I read it in 3rd grade or so, then read it again to clear it up more. Then I read it in 6 th grade and finally understood what was going on during the second reading of the will. In more recent readings I've understood more about Sydelle Paulaski and the relationship between Dr. Denton and the lovely Angela. What a pleasure. Ellen Raskin has written many other good children's books (all quirky and surprising) but this is the jewel. Bruno and Boots books by Gordon Korman : As the FNDP (Friendly Neighborhood Developmental Psychologis

Books I like: magic/science fiction

I read a lot of science fiction and fantasy when I was younger, so I was surprised when I was thinking about this list at how few books were on it. The other thing that is interesting is how many books I just remember a few details from, but not anything useful like a title or author. Half Magic and the whole series, by Edward Eager: My favorite is Knight's Castle, although I suspect I would have enjoyed it more if I had ever read Ivanhoe... Mrs. Piggle Wiggle by Betty MacDonald: I'm not sure when it happened, but I now identify with the parents rather than the kids. The Seven Citadels by Geraldine Harris: I came back to the Jr. High library to check this out even after I moved on to the high school. Girl with the Silver Eyes by Wilo Davis Roberts: I always wondered what would happen if I had ESP and other "special" abilities. The OZ books, by L. Frank Baum: I read almost all of these (all the ones I could find in the library, rather). My favorite is Tik - To